Date: xxx
Ref. xxx
To:
M/s. xxx Consulting Architects and Engineers
Dubai, UAE
Kind Attn: Mr. xxx
Project: 2B + G + 14+ Lower Roof Hotels Building on Plot No. xxx at Barsha, Dubai.
Subject: Submission of Missing Details for Waterproofing in our Previous Submittal CC/AP/269/07/27B Dt :xx
Dear Sir,
With reference to the above mentioned subject, in our previous submittal there are some information remain silent or kept blank , kindly find here with the missing information in our comparative statement submitted by Henkel letter # HPIL/TCS/15327/2015, please note the following
| S.no | Properties | Flexobit | Bituplus EX 4180 | As per site Specification 2 layer application | Remarks |
| Item # 03 | Thickness (mm) | 5.0+0.3 | 4 | In specification 5mm | Contractor proposal 4 + 4= 8mm |
| Item # 05 | Water tightness to liquid water (kpa) | 300 | 5 bar @ 50m | The Bituplus EX 4180 excellent resistance to positive water & vapor Pressure | |
| Item # 06 | Elongation at break length direction | 1000 | 40/50 | Flexobit is 1000% because of non –reinforcement homogeneous pure bitumen but Bituplus EX 4180 40% because of mixture of bitumen and SBS polymer as well it have stable reinforcement core of non woven spun bond ployster rot-proof fabric |
| S.No | Properties | Flexobit | Bituplus EX 4180 | As per site Specification 2 layer application | Remarks |
| Item # 09 | Flow Resistance at elevated temperature | 90 | No flow till 100 degree centigrade | ||
| Item # 12 | Reaction to Fire | F | Fl | Both the materials by product of the petrol chemical (No fire resistance) |
So kindly find the missing information for your kind comparison and further explanation & enabling to comparison to avoid any comments for because of missing item
Related posts:
Cost Estimation for Removal of the Debris for S.s. Xxx and Required Immediate Permission for Removal of the Same as Per Dm Instruction
Status and Update for Office Set up as on Xxx
Regards,
For xxx Contracting L.L.C
xxx
Project Manager
