xxx response against letter pertaining “Abortive works to structural slab for Pod drainage penetration”

Our Ref: xxx

Date: xxx

To                    :           xxx Construction Co. L.L.C.

                                    P. O. Box xxx

            Dubai – UAE.

Attention          :           xxx

                        :           Sr. Project Manager

Project             :           xxx Park Hotel Dubai

Subject            :           xxx response against letter pertaining “Abortive works to structural slab for Pod drainage penetration”

Dear Mr. xxx,

We received your letter regarding the abortive works to structural slab for Pod drainage penetration and xxx don’t agree to any sort of cost deduction from our certifications.

Please note that the site already have a lot of discrepancies in coring as we all know and xxx is still supporting this project to a big extent to overcome the delays. We would like to remind you that we had produced around 250 different types of pods against 4 types of pods originally to support the project for which we have all rights to claim for a Variation of Contract.

However Please note the below points for your information and record,

• xxx have not produced neither provided any templates to xxx for the Non typical pods.

• The list of pods mentioned in your letter Ref: xxx were already installed so we couldn’t verify your claim. If you have noticed any difference it is important that you notify xxx to avoid the situation.

• We verified all our drawings against the as build drainage positions of the pods and found no discrepancies in any of the pods.

• xxx have investigated at site together with your team and found no error in our pods against our drawings.  We didn’t find any difference which is exceeding the tolerance.

Pod No	Typical/Non-Typical	Pod As per approved drawing	Remarks
2R-1-3-03	Non-Typical	Yes – physically verified at site	2 MM difference from site coring
6R-1-3-81	Non-Typical	Yes – physically verified at site	2 MM difference from site coring
7R-1-4-15	Non-Typical	Yes – physically verified at site	xxx – Drawing was wrong
7L-1-4-14	Non-Typical	Yes – physically verified at site	2MM difference from site coring
Type-1R	Typical	Yes – physically verified at site	12-15 mm difference from coring

Accordingly we would expect the same spirit of cooperation from xxx what we showed towards your project so that we can complete this project as a team successfully.

This is for your information and record.

Yours faithfully,

On behalf of xxx LLC

xxx

Projects Manager