RE- Compliance to Consultant Issued Site Instruction No. xxx

Our Ref: xxx

Date: xxx

To                          

xxx Contracting Company LLC

P. O. Box xxx, Dubai, U.A.E.

Attention            : Mr. xxx, Senior Project Manager

Project                 : xxx Tower, Dubai – U.A.E.

Subject                 : RE- Compliance to Consultant Issued Site Instruction No. xxx

Dear Sir,

We are in receipt of your letter ref: xxx dated 15 March xxx regarding the compliance to site instruction ref. SI/130 and we would like to note the following:

First, there are no problems with the pods slopes and the slopes degrees are exactly as per the approved pods shop drawings.

In addition, it must be reminded that our pods are installed on site based on level points provided to us by your surveyor and our pods are being inspected and approved. Therefore, M/s xxx (Contractor Name) is not responsible for the levelling of these pods which may be the cause behind any water backflow that you are referring to.

On the other hand, backflow of water is not stated anywhere in the site instruction (appendix 1) and accordingly your statement that the consultant physically checked and found water backflow towards door entrance is not recorded anywhere and remains only an assumption made by the Main Contractor and false allegation towards us.

Moreover, the site instruction is referring to all the mockup apartment wet areas and not only to pods. For instance the laundry room is not in the scope of M/s xxx (Contractor Name) but according to the site instruction is having the same slope issues.

In closure, there are no issues related to the pods slopes to be rectified from M/s xxx (Contractor Name) and corrective action is not required from our end.

As a good will, because it is not possible to adjust the pods levelling on site with the current site condition, we have supported and adjusted the floor tiles in the mockup apartment pods to satisfy the consultant requirement but it is under no circumstances an issue related to the pods themselves and if similar support is required in other locations on site, it will be treated as abortive works with associated time & cost implications.

Furthermore, it is noticed that the site instruction is dated 02 Mach xxx but was only shared with M/s xxx (Contractor Name) on 15 March xxx, therefore we urge you in the future to communicate any matter related to M/s xxx (Contractor Name) scope on prompter basis to allow us to respond or take the necessary action (if any).

M/s xxx (Contractor Name) will not be responsible for any consequences arising from any delay or failure in sharing the proper information on time.

This is for your information & record.

Yours faithfully,

On behalf of M/s xxx (Contractor Name) LLC

xxx

Projects Manager